#2 Worst: Roberson vs. Marshman Seemed A Mismatch
Fans have regularly raised doubt about the UFC’s card position – as in, which battles they go onto the compensation per-see part of their shows – and the previous evening gave us another precedent in the Jack Marshman versus Karl Roberson battle.
It was not the most exceedingly bad battle ever and I am not thumping either man’s exertion, but rather did this truly have a place on a demonstrate that fans were paying to watch? I had to contend no.
Wrestling – WWE: Why AJ Styles Will Be A Good Fit To Replace Roman Reigns?
Roberson wound up winning a choice in what was a strong yet forgettable excursion, and keeping in mind that he’s unmistakably a conventional prospect, it is improbable that he or Marshman will probably be in title dispute at any point in the near future.
I know the UFC have a personal stake in him falling off Dana White’s Contender Series, and I know they were additionally hoping to book a considerable measure of Middleweight battles on the primary card here, however the point still stands.
Boxing: Osman Aslam Successfully Extends Winning Run
Before Cormier and Lewis ventured into the headliner space, UFC 230’s headliner would’ve been a Women’s Flyweight title coordinate between Valentina Shevchenko and Sijara Eubanks.
That battle wound up being frosted, however Eubanks stayed on the card – yet was put on the prelims. Of course, her battle wasn’t incredible, yet it was presumably tantamount to Roberson/Marshman. Given the UFC had planned for her to headliner a major show, for what reason would she say she was not being displayed on the compensation per-see?
Boxing: Heavyweight Champion David Haye Retires
The arrangement of Roberson/Marshman wasn’t sufficient to demolish the show obviously – it was a solid pay-per-see even with it – yet the UFC truly should guarantee positioned contenders – or if nothing else blue-chip prospects – battle on their compensation per-sees, particularly when they charge such a great amount for fans to arrange them.
